Oakland City Auditor Says Oakland Ignores Most Recommendations

FacebookEmailBloggerLinkedInTwitterShare

Oakland (Special to ZennieReport.com) – Oakland uses less than half of The Oakland City Auditor’s recommendations. The Office of the Oakland City Auditor, ran by Acting City Auditor Michael C. Houston, MPP, CIA, released its first ever comprehensive audit recommendation follow-up report.

In reviewing all the recommendations issued over the past 10 years, Oakland City Auditor’s staff found that of 265 unique audit recommendations, the City Administration has implemented 117 of them, or 44 percent. Another 62 recommendations (23 percent) are partially implemented, while 86 (33 percent) have not been implemented.

Oakland City Administration Tasked With Implementing City Auditor Recommendations

The Office of the City Auditor independently assesses City programs and makes recommendations to improve them, but the City Administration must implement the recommendations towards fulfilling the common goal of an equitable, effective, and ethical City government.

The Oakland City Auditor’s report represents a new process for the City, and was implemented in response to Measure X, the government reform amendment to the City Charter passed by voters in November 2022. Among other items, Measure X revised the City Charter to include, within the City Auditor’s authority and duties, “submitting, at a public meeting of the full City Council, a semiannual report to the Council and public on the extent of implementation of recommendations for corrective actions made in the City Auditor’s reports.”

Prior to this semiannual reporting process, the Oakland City Auditor’s Office followed up on recommendations within audits individually, its most recent being the 2022 Oakland Police Department (OPD) Overtime Recommendation Follow-Up Report.

Oakland City Auditor Recommendations Cover All City Services

The recommendations within this report span the breadth of City services. The City Auditor’s Office coordinated with staff throughout the City to understand the status of each audit recommendation issued over the past decade.

The recommendations within this report span the breadth of City services. The City Auditor’s Office coordinated with staff throughout the City to understand the status of each audit recommendation issued over the past decade. The report calls out, for example, recommendations to encourage community awareness of the City’s Rent Adjustment Program, and to implement performance measures to track the Fire Department’s progress on state-mandated fire safety inspections. Even some recommendations from recent reports – like one from the December 2023 audit of Measure Q parks funding – have already been implemented.

The report also includes important recommendations that have not yet been implemented; for example, 26 recommendations relating to the 2021 Audit of Homeless Encampment Management have not been implemented, nor have 30 recommendations from the 2022 audit of homelessness services. Inaddition, several recommendations to reduce costs associated with police overtime have not been implemented. All current recommendations and their statuses as of December 31, 2023 are listed in an appendix.

Auditor Michael Houston said that recommendations vary in how difficult they are to implement and their impact, “but all of them have been made for a reason – to make the City of Oakland more transparent, to ensure compliance with state and federal laws, and to make government work better for all Oaklanders.”

The report shows the count of recommendations implemented by intended benefits. Overwhelmingly, the recommendations are intended to improve efficiency and effectiveness of City services, though others aim to improve transparency, legal compliance, or equity of outcomes; safeguard public resources; or provide economic benefits in the form of reduced costs or added revenue.

For years, it’s been difficult to show the impact of the Office’s audit reports. This report reveals the work of the City Auditor’s Office to recommend changes to improve Oakland’s government, as well as the work of the City Administration to implement the audit recommendations. Auditor Houston stated: “This new follow-up process will bring greater transparency and accountability. Now, residents and stakeholders will be able to see what’s become of these recommendations. We’ve even heard from new department heads that this report will be helpful to them in understanding their departments’ progress in implementing audit recommendations.”

Recommendations Follow-Up Process Different From Audit Process

The recommendation follow-up process is different from the audit process, but it does require auditors to review the departments’ status updates. Auditor Houston noted: “In some cases, it’s important to know just where they stand, what’s getting in the way of implementation, and we may note that. But where they’ve said they have implemented a recommendation, we ask for proof, and we check it, just like we would in an audit.”

Auditor Houston emphasized that the goal is to have all recommendations implemented, which means, “if we were to repeat all of our past audits, we would not have the same findings.”The recommendation follow-up report serves as a reminder to the City Administration that open audit recommendations represent opportunities to make specific operational and policy changes that will result in more equitable, effective, and efficient City services to Oakland residents, businesses, and visitors.

The Office plans to issue its next follow-up report as of June 30, 2024. In future cycles, the Office plans to include target dates, so residents and staff know when to expect implementation. “Creating sustainable institutional change takes time – it’s a practice in patience. Since this is our first cycle, we’re setting a baseline. Now, we’ll be able to look back and see the changes over time more clearly.”

The City Auditor will present the report to the City Council on a future date.  It can be downloaded here:

https://www.scribd.com/document/715950895/Oakland-Audit-Recommendation-Follow-Up-Report-FINAL-2024

Michael C. Houston, MPP, CIA Biography

Michael assumed the role of Acting City Auditor on October 14, 2023, after the previous City Auditor, Courtney Ruby resigned. To finish out Courtney Ruby’s term, Michael ran unopposed for the seat of City Auditor in March 2024. The election results will soon be certified.

Michael has over 15 years of government auditing experience having previously worked at the San Jose City Auditor’s Office where he analyzed the efficiency and effectiveness of myriad city programs, and at Cal State University East Bay, where he directed the campus’ internal audit and investigation functions.

He joined the Office of the City Auditor in 2019 as the Whistleblower Program Manager, a role in which he led investigations into allegations of fraud, waste, and abuse reported to the City Auditor’s Whistleblower Hotline.

Mr. Houston was promoted to Assistant City Auditor in April 2021 and led the Office’s professional staff in conducting performance audits, investigations, and special analyses.He was promoted to Assistant City Auditor in April 2021 and led the Office’s professional staff in conducting performance audits, investigations, and special analyses.

Michael has a Master of Public Policy degree from U.C. Berkeley, a Bachelor of Arts degree in History from Sonoma State University and is a Certified Internal Auditor.

Visit: www.oaklandauditor.com to learn more about Oakland’s Office of the City Auditor.

Leave a Comment

Index